Weekend
1 round-up, 16-17 Nov 2013
-
John Saunders
The 21st season of the 4NCL
(British Team Chess League) got underway over
the weekend of 16-17 November at Hinckley
Island, Daventry and Darlington, with 16 teams
doing battle in each of Divisions 1 and 2, and
60 clubs playing in Divisions 3 South and North.
One significant big change to
the format this year has been to the time
control. The traditional classical time limit
(40 moves in 120 minutes, 20 in 60 minutes, then
all remaining moves in 30 minutes) has been
discarded in favour of 40 moves in 100 minutes,
then all the moves in 50 minutes, with 30-second
increments from the start of the game. Some
quick mental arithmetic reveals that both time
controls are effectively the same until move 60,
at which point those incontinent in their use of
time (and, ahem, other ways) might find
themselves having to get a wiggle on until
they’ve stocked up their time allotment with a
few increments.
Where did we leave things last
year? Actually, it was a bit like the English
Football Premier League, with a Dutchman called
Robin van something scoring the winning game
point to enable Guildford 1 to draw their final
match with Wood Green 1 to finish ahead of them
on match points and take the championship.
ROUND 1: GERMAN BITE
Unsurprisingly, Guildford 1 and
Wood Green 1 are likely to be the main
contenders again in 2013/14. Guildford 1 started
in Pool A with a match against newly-promoted
Grantham Sharks. Only one Guildford player
suffered a shark bite, namely Eric Hansen, a
young GM from Canada, who lost to untitled (but
2426-rated) Holger Grund of Germany in a
tactical mêlée. German bite... where I have
heard that term before? Ah, I know, on the BBC
Shipping Forecast: they probably don’t get that
in Canada. (Just in case you think I know
Rockall about spelling, yes, I am aware that in
a shipping context I should spell it ‘bight’.)
 |
Matthew
Sadler |
It was good to see Guildford top
board Matthew Sadler playing again. I chatted to
him briefly before the second round and he tells
me he has played only a handful of games in the
Netherlands since his three games in last year’s
4NCL. And of course he will be one of the six
English players to take part in the London Chess
Classic next month. Matthew made a pretty good
start, beating IM Ameet Ghasi on the top board.
Ameet seemed to be OK in the early middlegame,
though it was hard to judge from Matthew’s face
– he nearly always wears a deep frown as he
concentrates at the board. Ameet tried to round
up Matthew’s vulnerable c-pawn, but Matthew
replied by unleashing a multiplicity of pins,
most of them spearing Ameet’s pieces.
4NCL Division 1a, Round 1, 2013
M.Sadler (Guildford 1) - A.Ghasi (Grantham
Sharks 1)
Slav Defence
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 d5 4.e3 a6 5.Nf3 b5 6.b3
Bg4 7.Bd2 Nbd7 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 b4 10.Na4 e5
11.Qd1 In 2009 Magnus Carlsen played 11.Rc1
here against Wang Yue at Linares – and lost.
Maybe that surprise result is why most
subsequent players have given it a miss and
played the text move, although 11.Qd1 has fared
quite poorly as well. 11...exd4 12.exd4 Ne4
13.g3 Qf6 13...Bd6 14.Bg2 Ndf6 15.0-0 was
played in Aronian-Svidler, Nalchik GP 2009, and
drawn a few moves later. 14.Be3 Qe6
Obliging White to overprotect the bishop on e3
as 14...Nxg3 is threatened. 15.Qf3 Bd6 16.Bg2
0-0 17.0-0 f5 18.cxd5 cxd5 19.Rac1 Rac8 20.Rfe1
Be7 21.Qd1 The second time the queen has
retreated to its original square. 21...Qf6
22.Nc5 Ndxc5 23.dxc5 Rfd8 24.Bd4 Qf7 25.c6
White’s advanced c-pawn looks in some danger of
dropping off but the unfortunate way Black goes
about rounding it up only seems to strengthen
White’s game. 25...Bg5?! Black should
probably settle for something like 25...Rd6
26.c7 Bf6 27.Bc5 Rc6 28.Bxb4 Rxc1 29.Qxc1 Qxc7,
which looks roughly equal. 26.Rc2 Rd6 27.c7
Rd7 28.h4 Be7 29.Be5 Qe6 30.Bf4 Bd6 The best
bet looks like 30...h6!? when White still has a
good game after 31.f3 g5 32.fxe4 gxf4 33.exf5
Qxf5 34.Rc6!, according to Hiarcs, but the
tactics might be harder for a human player to
work out. 31.Rc6! The two pins of minor
pieces against the queen prove difficult to
meet. 31.f3? would be a disaster area after
31...Bxf4 32.gxf4 Qb6+, etc. 31...Rcxc7
32.Rxa6 h6?! The best an analysis engine can
come up with is 32...Ra7!? 33.Bxe4 fxe4 34.Rxa7
Rxa7 35.Bxd6 Qxd6 36.Rxe4 Rxa2, which brings
about material equality, but Black has much the
more exposed king after 37.Re8+ Kf7 38.Rc8, etc.
33.Rxd6! Rxd6 34.f3 Black can’t really
hope to escape the various pins less than a
piece for pawns down but he now makes matters
worse. 34...Rc3? 35.fxe4 fxe4

36.Bxe4! Creating a new pin and vastly
better than 36.Bxd6? Qxd6 when White’s weakness
on g3 means he still has work to do. 36...Qf6
Black has to dodge the bullet of Bh7+,
winning his queen. 37.Bxd5+! Again,
better than taking on d6, and this time creating
a self-pin. 37...Kh8 38.Re8+ 1-0 38...Kh7
and now the mundane 39.Bxd6 is probably best.
Guildford 1 ran out 5½-2½
winners against Grantham, as did Wood Green 1
against 3Cs in an adjacent (shark) pool. They
too sustained severe damage in the process. They
fielded three former British champions, with no
fewer than seven national titles between them,
but these three gentlemen could only manage ½/3
between them. The rest of the team provided an
emphatic 5/5, however. Gordon-Rowson was a game
of some complexity and difficult material
imbalances but eventually came down to a drawn
endgame. Jon Speelman seemed to be winning
against a young Chinese player, Qiu Tong, but
then drifted and blundered, while Jacob Aagaard
also lost to Alex Longson, after what looked
like an innocuous opening for the 31-year-old
Mancunian FM suddenly turned nasty for his
Danish GM opponent.
 |
|
Jacob
Aagaard, Jonathan Speelman, Alex
Longson |
|
Unsurprisingly, Guildford 1 and
Wood Green 1 are likely to be the main
contenders again in 2013/14. Guildford 1 started
in Pool A with a match against newly-promoted
Grantham Sharks. Only one Guildford player
suffered a shark bite, namely Eric Hansen, a
young GM from Canada, who lost to untitled (but
2426-rated) Holger Grund of Germany in a
tactical mêlée. German bite... where I have
heard that term before? Ah, I know, on the BBC
Shipping Forecast: they probably don’t get that
in Canada. (Just in case you think I know
Rockall about spelling, yes, I am aware that in
a shipping context I should spell it ‘bight’.)
Pool 1a featured three other
heavy scores. Cheddleton look to be Guildford’s
main rivals in the preliminary section and they
dished out a 7-1 hammering to Oxford. It
featured an amusing tactical sequence in which
Black played a cheapo, White unleashed a
counter-cheapo... but Black then played a
counter-counter-cheapo to resolve the matter.
4NCL Division 1a, Round 1, 2013
B.Savage (Oxford) -
S.Williams (Cheddleton)

28...Nxh2 That’s cheapo no.1. 29.Nf2
If 29.Qxh2 Qe3+, regaining the piece and staying
a pawn up with an overwhelming game. But White’s
text move is cheapo no.2 – how can Black
extricate his knight from h2? At first sight it
looks as if he will be tied to the defence of
the knight forever... 29...Qd2! ... but
this move, cheapo no.3, solves the problem.
30.dxc6 Qxc3 31.Kxh2 bxc6 32.Ng4 Nd7 33.Qd1 Qb2+
34.Kh3 h5 35.Nh2 Qd4 36.Qxd4 exd4 37.Nf3 c5
38.Kg2 Ne5 39.Ne1 Kf6 40.Kf2 g5 41.Ke2 h4
42.gxh4 gxh4 43.Kf2 Kg5 0-1
 |
Simon
Williams |
Wood Green 2 also filled their
boots, beating King’s Head 6-2. Their only
casualty was Malcolm Pein, who came a cropper at
the hands of his former pupil Ravi Haria. The
final result of the pool was something of a
surprise, with Barbican 2, with one IM,
overcoming Blackthorne Russia, with one GM and
four IMs. Barbican 2 scored three wins where the
rating differential was less marked, but
arguably did rather better in holding on some of
the other boards where the higher rated
opposition might have been expected to ‘walk
it’. 14-year-old Cosima Keen’s performance in
drawing with the highly-experienced Dave Ledger
was particularly meritorious.
Turning to the other three
matches of Pool 1b, Guildford 2 were even more
effective than their first team, blowing away
Cambridge University by 7-0. This is going to
sound confusing, but Cambridge’s zero points did
contain one stellar success, with Daniel Bisby
beating Yang-Fan Zhou, but this single game
point was forfeited because of a default
elsewhere.
4NCL Division 1b, Round 1, 2013
D.Bisby (Cambridge
University) - Zhou,Yang-Fan (Guildford 2)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Qc7
6.Be3 a6 7.Be2 Nf6 8.a3 Be7 9.f4 d6 10.g4 Nd7
11.g5 b5 12.Nxc6 Qxc6 13.Qd2 0-0 14.0-0-0 Nc5
14...Nb6 15.Qd4 Rb8 16.h4 was played in a GM
game a couple of years ago, although only in a
blitz competition. 15.h4!? Rb8 One
wonders if White’s last move was a bluff. If
15...Nxe4 16.Bf3 Qxc3 17.bxc3 Nxd2 18.Bxa8 Nc4
19.Bf2 d5 and the light-squared bishop is
entombed in the corner. Of course, White didn’t
have to play 16.Bf3 - 16.Nxe4 is safe enough -
but Black has an extra pawn. 16.f5 exf5 17.h5
White decides to continue with his gung-ho
kingside attack. 17...b4 Again, 17...Nxe4
is the obvious option, though perhaps White has
some compensation for his pawns. 18.axb4 Rxb4
19.h6 Be6 Permitting White to unlock the
door to the black king. 19...g6 seems to be the
right move, though the possibility of being
mated on g7 must have been a worry for Black.
For example, 20.Nd5 wins against all but one
Black reply. Unfortunately, that one (rather
obvious) move is 20...Nb3+, winning White’s
queen and the game. 20.hxg7 Rfb8

As
so often in such Sicilian lines, with both sides
poised to strike down a semi-open file, it’s all
about buying some time to ensure your attack
gets home first. 21.Bb5!! Clearing a path
for the white queen to come to h2, threatening
Qxh7 mate, whilst at the same time attacking the
queen and obstructing the force of the doubled
black rooks on the b-file. It’s delicious,
multi-purpose moves like this which make chess
worthwhile. 21...Nd3+ 22.Bxd3 fxe4
22...Rxb2 is simply a bluff as 23.Qh2 and Black
has nothing on the b-file. 23.Rxh7!
23.Qh2 now would be a mistake as the simple
23...Bf5 is a stubborn defence. 23...Bf5
24.Qh2 f6 25.Rh8+ Kf7 26.Rxb8 Your computer
may find other fancy finishes but this will do
very nicely. 26...Rxb8 27.Qh8 Rg8 28.Be2 Qc8
29.Rh1 d5 30.Nxd5 Bd6 31.Nxf6 1-0
 |
Yang-Fan
Zhou |
White Rose overcame e2e4.org.uk
quite comfortably, with the losing team’s
endgame play letting them down somewhat. This
game had an attractive finish.
4NCL Division 1b, Round 1, 2013
M.Gantner (White Rose) -
R.Norinkeviciute (e2e4.org.uk)

Black’s last move, 21...Rd8-c8 was an error.
22.Bxc5! dxc5 23.Nxb7! Ka7 23...Qxb7 24.Rb3
wins the queen. Best is 23...c4 but after 24.Nd6
Black would lose a second pawn anyway.
24.Qc4! Qxb7 25.Rd7! Qxd7 26.Qxa6+ Kb8 27.Rb3+
Kc7 28.Qb6 mate 1-0
Barbican 1 had rather too much
firepower for Grantham Sharks 2. Actually, 2½
game points wasn’t a bad result for a team that
was so heavily down on rating, and Barbican 1
might yet rue a missed opportunity to gain more
game points.
ROUND 2: NAVAL GAZING
The Sunday round saw the first
encounter between the two big fleets, when the
Guildford heavy battleship exchanged salvoes
with Wood Green’s light cruiser. Guildford’s
first team scored six hits to Wood Green second
team’s two, with only John Emms managing to sink
an opponent, French GM Jean-Pierre Le Roux, with
a stray torpedo just before the time control.
Quite the Nelson touch...
4NCL Division 1a, Round 2, 2013
J.Emms (Wood Green 2) -
J-P.Le Roux (Guildford 1)

The
game had been fairly well balanced to this point
but now the Frenchman, who had just snaffled a
pawn on a4, comes unstuck... 39...g6??
40.g5!! gxh5 Whatever Black plays, White is
going to get an unstoppable pawn on h6, e.g.
40...hxg5 41.h6, etc. 41.gxh6 1-0 Come
what may, the h-pawn is going to advance, and
the white bishop will ensure a touch-down on h8.
Cheddleton versus Barbican 2
also ended 6-2, in line with ratings. But it
might have been close had Barbican taken their
chances. Grantham Sharks 1 also piled up an
impressive 6-2 scoreline against King’s Head.
Oxford took another beating, this time from
Blackthorne Russia.
In Pool 1b, Wood Green 1 scored
a 6½-1½ win against Cambridge University. This
match featured the game of the weekend between
Jonathan Rowson and Daniel Bisby. It ended in a
draw, though the computer thinks Bisby might
have been winning after Rowson’s final move,
which was accompanied by a draw offer. I confess
I spent almost the entire afternoon watching
this game, at times on my computer (using an
engine), and also in the playing room, watching
the players’ expressions as they tried to figure
out all the tactics of this complicated King’s
Indian Defence game. I give it below but without
annotations, since all I would be able to do
would be to quote long, mind-bending computer
suggestions, many of which I don’t fully
understand. Readers can play through it on their
own computers. It remains only to salute the two
players for their imagination and courage.
4NCL Division 1b, Round 2, 2013
J.Rowson (Guildford 1) -
D.Bisby (Cambridge University)
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0
6.Be2 e5 7.d5 a5 8.Be3 Ng4 9.Bg5 f6 10.Bh4 Na6
11.Nd2 h5 12.a3 Bd7 13.Rb1 Nc5 14.b3 Qc8 15.h3
Nh6 16.f3 f5 17.Qc2 f4 18.Bd1 Nf7 19.Ke2 g5
20.Bf2 g4 21.hxg4 hxg4 22.Qb2 b6 23.b4 Nb7
24.Bb3 g3 25.Bg1 Bf6 26.c5 axb4 27.axb4 bxc5
28.bxc5 Na5 29.Bc2 Qd8 30.c6

The
line of locked pawns running diagonally across
the board is a familiar sight in King’s Indian
games. Equally familiar is the theme of heavy
piece attacks in pursuit of each other’s king,
moving around the board in a vaguely clockwise
direction, reminding me (and my vivid
imagination) of the Ben Hur chariot race.
30...Bc8 31.Bd3 Kg7 32.Nb5 Ba6 33.Ra1 Bxb5
34.Qxb5 Rh8 35.Rxh8 Qxh8 36.Rxa5 Qh1 37.Kf1 Rh8
38.Ra2 Rh2 39.Nc4 Ng5 40.Qb8 Nxf3 41.Qxc7+ Kg6
42.Qa7 Rh7 43.Qb6 Nh2+ 44.Ke1 f3 45.Bf1 f2+
46.Rxf2 gxf2+ 47.Kxf2 Bh4+ 48.Ke2 Nxf1 49.c7 ½-½
 |
Stephen
Gordon, Jonathan Rowson, Nick Pert, Adam
Ashton |
Barbican 1 would have been
pleased to win their match with White Rose as
the two sides are likely to be rivals for high
places in the league come the end of the season.
They might have won rather more comfortably but
I expect they would have been happy enough with
4½-3½ and the two match points.
Guildford 2 might have expected
more than another 4½-3½ win against 3Cs but,
again, it was good enough for match purposes.
Yang-Fan Zhou scored a fine win against GM
Stephen Gordon, but Adam Ashton’s attack against
the king in an open game caught my decidedly
old-fashioned eye. Glenn Flear had almost a
walk-over win in the first round but he seemed
to be caught cold here.
4NCL Division 1b, Round 2, 2013
A.Ashton (3Cs) - G.Flear (Guildford 2)
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.d3 Nf6 5.c3 a6
6.Bb3 Ba7 7.h3 d6 8.Nbd2 0-0 9.Nf1 h6 10.g4 Nh7
11.Rg1 We’re still in known territory.
11.Ng3 has been played a few times. 11...Na5
12.Bc2 d5 13.Qe2 dxe4 14.dxe4 Qd6 Seems a
bit slow and it also causes Black to lose a
tempo. Maybe 14...Ng5 or 14...Be6 is better.
15.Ne3 Ng5?! 15...Be6 16.Nf5 Bc4 looks
reasonable for Black. This exchange of knights
leaves Black very short of defenders on the
kingside. 16.Nxg5 hxg5 17.Nf5 Qd8
17...Bxf5 18.gxf5 f6 19.h4 also looks grim for
Black. 18.h4!

It’s difficult to know what to suggest for Black
now. He’s probably a goner. 18...gxh4 19.g5
Re8 20.Qh5! Bxf5 After 20...g6 simply
21.Qxh4! is the end, e.g. 21...gxf5 22.exf5 with
f6 and Qh7+ to follow. 21.exf5 Qd5 22.f6 e4
23.fxg7 f5 23...Kxg7 24.Qh6+ Kg8 25.g6 wins.
24.g6 1-0 24...Kxg7 25.Qh7+ Kf6 26.Bg5+
Ke6 27.Qf7+ Kd6 28.Bf4+ Re5 29.Rd1 is a sample
winning sequence.
Grantham Sharks 2 came close to
a match point against e2e4.org.uk but it was not
to be.
DIVISION TWO
Pool 2a scores after round 2:
KJCA Kings 4 (10½), Warwickshire 4(9½), Bristol 1
4 (8½), Anglian Avengers 2 (10), Rhyfelwyr
Essyllwg 2 (8), Wessex 0 (6½), Cambridge
University 2 0 (5½), Poisoned Pawns 0 (4). Bristol
appear to have much the strongest squad, with
Anglian Avengers having strength in depth and
one or two other squads looking useful.
Pool 2b scores after round 2:
The ADs 4(10), BCM Dragons 3 (9), Brown Jack 3
(8½), South Wales Dragons 2 (8), Bradford DCA
Knights 2 (8), Barbican Youth 1 (7½), White Rose
2 1 (7), Hackney 0 (5½). The ADs look favourites
to top this pool, but ratings may not be a good
indicator as highly-rated Hackney have made a
poor start.
Photos ©
John Saunders
Annotated games from the
above report |
Download
in PGN |
|